Materials and composition
Fibres, components, accessories, percentages and characteristics in a structured form.
Craftsmanship, documented. Organise materials, suppliers and evidence to prepare your textile DPP. Define restricted access and test the connection with your business systems in a scoped pilot.
Textile apparel is a priority under the ESPR working plan. The European Commission indicates Q4 2027 for the planned adoption of the delegated act: this is not a general DPP application date. Requirements, covered products and actual timing must be checked against applicable acts. A pilot can meanwhile organise sources, responsibilities, identifiers and data collection.
A textile DPP can combine technical data, origin, evidence and useful consumer content while keeping public and restricted layers separate.
Fibres, components, accessories, percentages and characteristics in a structured form.
Origin, transformations, sites and supply-chain actors linked to evidence.
Documents, declarations and reports associated with product, material or supplier.
Digital identity, history and events that help identify anomalies and copies.
Origin, care, maintenance, storytelling and services accessible by smartphone.
Guidance for repair, reuse, collection, recycling and material recovery.
Start with one item or product family. Identify the source system, evidence and reviewer for each information field. This table supports project preparation; it does not replace the future regulatory dataset for the product category.
| Information | Source to identify | Pilot check |
|---|---|---|
| Item, variant and batch | ERP or PLM master data | Unique link between identifier and product. |
| Materials and composition | Bill of materials, technical sheet and supplier evidence | Units, versions and consistency between declarations. |
| Suppliers, sites and processes | Supply chain records and process documents | Distinguish registered office, production site and processing step. |
| Certificates and reports | Original document and its scope | Validity, covered product, source and revision. |
| Access and updates | Role matrix and company procedure | Who approves, reads and updates each field. |
The template contains fictitious examples and also opens in Excel. Complete it locally without sending industrial data to NexusDpp. It is not a conformity certificate.

Suppliers and workshops can contribute specific fields. The brand or importer governs approvals and access while respecting information and access rights required by applicable acts.
Start with the product journey, processing steps and organisations holding the information. Supplier location helps plan language, responsibilities and data flows.
For a chain involving several subcontractors, link the batch to processing steps and available evidence. Keep material origin separate from the location of the last processing step.
For a fabric family, identify shared information and fields specific to a variant or batch. Associate each document with its actual scope.
Agree fields, units, instruction language and supporting documents. Preserve original evidence and assign a reviewer; assess data transfers for the specific case.
A non-EU location does not establish non-compliance. Applicability depends on the product, economic role and market; transfer rules also depend on the nature of the data.
The pilot should establish which information can be reused and what must be collected. API availability alone does not demonstrate a tested connector for SAP, Oracle or another system.
Identify where master data, bills of materials and documents are held, and which system owns each field.
Agree mappings, identifiers, formats and collection methods. For APIs or JSON, verify errors, permissions and versions.
Change a sample field, check approval and verify that the update reaches the intended product.
Integration scope, availability and costs are agreed for the project. Security controls must be verified against the actual service status. Read the Trust Center.
A reliable information base can support transparency, authenticity, post-sale service, reputation and customer engagement.
Claims are linked to data, sources and evidence.
Brand reputationIdentity and events make anomalies and duplication easier to identify.
Trust layerUseful content and services accessible directly from a smartphone.
User viewThe Commission indicates Q4 2027 for the planned adoption of the textile delegated act. This forecast is not a general application date. Scope, requirements and timing must be checked against the applicable acts.
One item or product family, materials and components, involved suppliers and available documents. The downloadable template helps identify sources, owners and checks; it is not a final list of legal obligations.
The access matrix must distinguish public information, restricted data and access by authorised parties under applicable legislation. The pilot tests which fields each role can view and update.
The project can start with available files and documents using an agreed collection process. Identifiers, units, responsibilities and checks must be defined before assuming automated integrations.
Connector compatibility and availability must be checked for the system, version and scope. The pilot documents mapping, exchange methods and an update test before assuming an operational integration.
A QR code opens the passport. Conformity also requires trustworthy data, evidence and applicable requirements to be met: a working link alone is not a conformity assessment.
Against an agreed scope: data and gap mapping, responsibilities, role-specific views, an update test and export of the sample. The result supports preparation and does not replace applicable regulatory assessments.
Define an initial scope and acceptance criteria before extending the work to the whole catalogue. Activities, timing and costs are agreed for the pilot project.